M24C64-RDW6TP [STMicroelectronics]

Name: M24C64-RDW6TP
Brand: STMicroelectronics
SKU: M24C64-RDW6TP
Availability: InStock

Part No:

M24C64-RDW6TP

EEPROM

Manufacturer:

STMicroelectronics

Description:

IC EEPROM 64KBIT I2C 1MHZ 8TSSOP.EEPROM Memory IC 64Kbit I2C 1 MHz 450 ns 8-TSSOP

RoHS Status:

Product FAQ

1. Is M24C64-RDW6TP available for RFQ?

Yes. M24C64-RDW6TP by STMicroelectronics is available for RFQ. Submit your required quantity and our team will confirm real-time stock, lead time, and volume pricing.

2. Why is there no fixed price for M24C64-RDW6TP?

Pricing for M24C64-RDW6TP can vary by order quantity, market availability, date code, packaging, and delivery destination. Request a quote to receive the latest volume pricing.

3. What are the key specifications of M24C64-RDW6TP?

M24C64-RDW6TP is a STMicroelectronics EEPROM with Packaging: Tape & Reel (TR), Cut Tape (CT) and Write Cycle Time - Word, Page: 5ms and ExportControlClassNumber: EAR99. Review the product details or submit an RFQ if you need confirmation before purchase.

4. How fast can I get a quote for M24C64-RDW6TP?

Our sales team usually responds within 24 hours after receiving your RFQ. The quote may include stock status, unit price, lead time, shipping options, and available alternatives.

5. How soon can M24C64-RDW6TP be shipped?

If stock is confirmed, in-stock parts can usually ship within 1–2 business days. Final lead time depends on quantity, stock source, and delivery destination.

6. Can you suggest alternatives to M24C64-RDW6TP?

Yes. If M24C64-RDW6TP is unavailable, obsolete, or does not meet your required lead time, we can help check similar STMicroelectronics EEPROM parts or compatible alternatives.

RFQ

Part Number:

M24C64-RDW6TP

Manufacturer:

STMicroelectronics

Looking for Pricing? Contact us for volume pricing.

IMPORTANT NOTICE

Quotations are subject to stock availability and may vary with market conditions. Prices and lead times are not guaranteed until a purchase order is confirmed. Ensure your contact details are correct to avoid delays in response.